The Fine Balance�
Protecting the Constitution vs. Protecting Children
>Protecting children is generally accepted as a compelling state interest, hence the ubiquitous �Harmful to Minors� laws.
>Sexual content is sometimes capable of regulation, while content containing violence and drugs is more difficult to restrict.
>Religious groups use the catchphrase of �protecting children� to further moral agendas including censorship of video games.
>Government must also prove the existence of some �harm� resulting from the speech it wants to regulate.